5 Ways the Star Wars Prequels were better than 4-6
I read this article in which the author attempts to defend the political shrewdness of Star Wars Episodes 1-3 over 4-6…
Here’s the link.
http://movies.yahoo.com/news/why-star-wars-prequels-better-original-trilogy-160300514.html
It comes off like a debate student charged with defending an unpopular topic. He attempts to draw parallels between the post 9-11 world and the world of the prequels. As Phantom Menace came out in 1999, and Attack of the Clones was well in to production by the time 9/11 happened, this is a bit laughable.
But it got me to thinking: Is there any ground on which one COULD claim superiority of the Prequels? Special effects aside (as it seems unfair to put the 70′s up against the full weight of 30-odd years of technological advances), in which, if any, ways does 1-3 come out ahead?
Being a big fan of arguing about shit that doesn’t matter in the slightest, I’m all about picking up the standard and charging up the hill of unpopular opinion. Now, by no means does this mean I believe that the prequels win in a straight comparison, and yes, I’m fully aware of the suckitude that is Jar Jar Binks, and midichlorians. If you ask me which of the films is the best, I’m likely to say that none of them pass a 7/10, but Empire is probably the most watchable, with the first 30 minutes of Jedi a close second, and the Podrace 3rd.
1)The tragic nature of Anakin’s path, is far superior than any character arc in Ep 4-6. The Original trilogy has characters that change over the course of the films, but it’s all pretty superficial. Luke is meant to have matured, but it’s not well handled or particularly strong. Anakin, for all of his other faults, follows his heart, and tries in vain to protect those he loves. Yes, he makes some bad choices along the way, but his is by far the strongest of all the characters in the Star Wars universe.
2) The lightsaber battles are much, much better. No comparison. Now, the “decades of technology” argument might have a little to do with this, but mostly, it’s about the movement and the choreography. Luke has a few nice moments in the OT, but it’s no contest. Darth Maul runs circles around pretty much every fight in the OT.
3) The characters are more fleshed out, and more complex. Lucas isn’t exactly known for his brilliance with character depth, but 1-3 gives us characters with struggle, who react to what happens around them, who make decisions based on their emotions. Apart from the previous point about Anakin, we have Padme, who starts out as a one dimensional figurehead, but over the course of 3 films, becomes much more than that. Even Obi Wan follows a path from student to master.
4) Better droids. While there’s no arguing that R2D2 is pretty much the coolest droid in universe, Episodes 1-3 have the Droidekas. In fact, one has to wonder why the Emperor didn’t use them more after he took over. They’re pretty bad-ass. The Battle droids are also pretty sharp, and even the comical B1 battle droids (the little tan-colored guys) were decent. One might make an argument for the Gonk Droid from the OT, I might be swayed slightly due to the childhood memories of the action figure, and it’s lame-but-coolness.
GONK!
5) More aventure in exotic locations. Now, this might be touching on the “30 odd years of technology” part, but while the original trilogy brings us to Death Stars, Ice Planets, Swamps and cloud cities, The prequels take us further, and spend more time exploring their environments. We have Naboo, which has more than one (!) biome. We travel to the edge of the universe to the clone making facilities. We have a battle on a spaceship that is suddenly forced to deal with gravity. We explore Coruscant, and Kashyyyk. We battle in the lava on Mustafar. We explore the rainy high-tech world of Kamino. Even the sets themselves are bigger, more expansive. The fight on board Dooku’s flagship comes to mind.
So there you have it. Some good things to say within the frame of a larger evil. Thoughts? Disagreement? Just want to vent about Jar Jar? Knock yourselves out!
For though #5: You aptly described almost every Mario Bros. game since 3. The lava level! The ice level! The desert level! THE UNDERWATER LEVEL! The main antagonist can even throw fireball-like Foce-lightning!
[Reply To This Comment]
admin_rock Reply:
February 21st, 2012 at 2:33 pm
@The M-Daddy, Lolz. Love it. Maybe that’s how Lucas came up with them. There’s even a princess, (well, a Queen).
[Reply To This Comment]
Tomass Reply:
February 21st, 2012 at 2:51 pm
On an unrelated, related topic, I’ve always had a bit of an issue with the fact that nearly every world in the SW universe (books, movies games) is served up as a mono environment.
Hoth = Ice planet
Mustafar = Lava world
Tatooine = Desert
Coruscant = City
Dagobah = Swamp
Alderaan = Switzerland
Alderaan (post explosion) = Asteroid belt
I’m not expecting a geography lesson for every planet. It’s just always struck me as strange.
[Reply To This Comment]
1/4 20 Reply:
February 22nd, 2012 at 7:40 am
i would say it was a way of saving time and effort. nothing is easier than mono climate.
[Reply To This Comment]
Cub Reporter K Reply:
February 23rd, 2012 at 10:21 am
@The M-Daddy,
Mono climate is easier to unpack.
eg: Dune, desert planet.
Not Dune, 60% desert, 20% frozen waterless tundra, 15% semi-arid, 5% urbanized with a dry heat.
[Reply To This Comment]
Anyone who refers to the Star Wars films as the OT is an idiot! The prequels were films 4-6 not 1-3. They didn’t need to be made and if they were going to be made it should have be done by a fan. Not some hypocritical billionaire who became the very thing he fought against while making the Star Wars films. (Now George is a corporate sell out with the same cash and carry motivation as the very slobs how tried to shut him down.) They should have been made by someone that isn’t a liar, claiming he wrote them all at one time and shot them in this order because the forth installment was cheaper to make. Spare us George!
This article must have been written by a six year old. Who is in love with the prequels as much as I was in love with Star Wars when it came out when I was ten. Sure Star Wars has some short coming and some things that make me wonder what he was thinking now. So what, I was ten when it came out! The prequels are crap, crap and more crap. The third one was easier to watch than the other two by a long shot. But it’s still crap. Darth Maul was the only redeeming factor in the prequels and even that was mishandled by George. The Empire Strikes Back is by far the superior film for lots of reasons, and amazing how George didn’t have his chubby little mitts all over this one. The Originals unaltered, no special addition needed, are still fun to watch. Who cares if it’s a tad lame now, were not little boys anymore!
[Reply To This Comment]
admin_rock Reply:
February 27th, 2012 at 8:50 am
@Fat American, it’s unclear if your criticism is meant for this article, or the one linked, but I can assure you no one here thinks the prequels are better than the OT (and yes, OT is a perfectly acceptable way to refer to Episodes 4-6, as they were the Original Trilogy).
[Reply To This Comment]
First off, you’re an idiot. You can tell that I am wise because I did not spell “you’re” as “your”. Second off, what the holy fuck are you smoking? And D, watch and learn
http://redlettermedia.com/plinkett/star-wars/star-wars-episode-1-the-phantom-menace/
If any of you have not seen these, they are roughly 19 parsecs better than anything you have seen before.
[Reply To This Comment]
admin_rock Reply:
March 12th, 2012 at 11:03 am
@Homer, Wow. Umm, yes, I’ve seen those. What the fuck is your point?
[Reply To This Comment]
If you want to see specifically why you are a moron for liking the lightsaber battles in the new one, go to the 25:00 mark of part 2.
[Reply To This Comment]
admin_rock Reply:
March 12th, 2012 at 11:04 am
@Homer, Smells a bit like troll in here. But, no, you’re totally wrong. There’s no comparison between the level of battles in the OT vs the prequels.
[Reply To This Comment]
That you’re an idiot. Was that not clear in my first sentence?
[Reply To This Comment]
My biggest dispute is with #3. The characters in the prequils are all like cardboard cutouts that never develop much past their base emotion as assigned by the director. Anakin = angry, Padme = concerned, Obiwan = reasonable, Jar Jar = zany, and so not with all the other characters that didn’t leave enough of an impression to remember.
I think the biggest insult to the audience is the character development. They are act as if they are stuck in a script that is in no way influenced by the world around them or the actions of others. For instance, possibly the worst moment of the three comes when Padme is suddenly love struck in Ep. 2 by an Anakin who just admitted to murdering a whole village full of people. Yeah they were sand people but sentient beings none the less. Her reaction is to his uncontrolled murder spree: OMG you are so hot right now! If I could get Padme (Natalie Portman) in the sack by killing a village or two, there would be no one left on Earth at this point, but chances are telling her I just killed a bunch of women and children isn’t going to be much of a turn-on. Unless, Padme is the true evil in the movie.
[Reply To This Comment]